It’s called LSD for a reason.
I finally started a thread at Law School Discussion. I asked what people thought of the Joe Horn case, in which a Texan (Horn) capped two burglars who were robbing his neighbor’s house.
Horn even told the 911 Operator that he was going to kill the robbers –
This sums up what happened:
Operator: Mr. Horn, do not go out the house.
Horn: I’m sorry. This ain’t right, buddy.
Operator: You’re going to get yourself shot if you go outside that house with that gun. I don’t care what you think. Stay in the house.
Horn: You wanna make a bet? I’m gonna kill ’em.
The discussion on LSD has been interesting, but a bit disturbing too.
All of the participants are law students or future law students. Some of the law students have looked up statutes to support their arguments, but others have basically said, “Good. Thank good these illegals got shot. They had it coming. If you’re stupid enough to rob someone, you’re stupid enough to get capped. So what if a private citizen has more authority to kill someone than a cop? GOOD. Let the neighborhood watch dispense the death penalty.”
I also love how you can’t kill someone who punches you and walks away, or someone who has raped a child, but you can (in theory) kill someone who has stolen a bag of chips from the grocery store.
I’m curious how a professor would deal with that type of logic in class.