During statutory interpretation:
Professor M: “Scalia points to the conference history and admits ‘yeah that’s inconsistent with what I’m saying but I’m Scalia and I don’t care about legislative history…’”
The topic is the Scalia dissent in Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter of Cmtys. for a Great Or., 515 U.S. 687 (U.S. 1995)
2 Comments
Chère
February 23, 2009 at 12:48 pmI’d just like to say, that’s my home town. Mmhmm. So proud 🙂 Don’t mess with the loggers!!