I’ve said this before, but the hilarity is in the footnotes.
Today’s case is from my Wills & Trusts class: Succession of Bacot aka, “the gay will contest.”
There’s a noteworthy discussion at the end of whether a man can be a concubine of another man. “A concubine is as essential to a state of concubinage as a ghost is to Hamlet.”
Fact section after the jump.
Our first real case for Professional Responsibility is Converse v. Nebraska State Bar Comm’n (In re Converse), 258 Neb. 159 (Neb. 1999).
The case is about a law student who was not admitted to the bar because of his various…uh, indiscretions:
One of the final issues addressed by the Commission in its hearing was that of a T-shirt [the student] produced and marketed on which a nude caricature of [the law school dean] is shown sitting astride what appears to be a large hot dog.
That’s not even the worst of it.
The bulk of the fact section is after the jump: