I love it:
Me: “I think you totally facebook stalk me.”
Jamie: “No, I just know what my boyfriend’s up to.”
Me: “That’s your spin on it?”
Jamie: “I didn’t go to school for PR.”
I love it:
Me: “I think you totally facebook stalk me.”
Jamie: “No, I just know what my boyfriend’s up to.”
Me: “That’s your spin on it?”
Jamie: “I didn’t go to school for PR.”
Here are some things I’ve found useful, thought I’d share:
One day, she held up her casebook to point out there was almost no underlining or highlighting. However, in the margins of the book were handwritten notes. She explained that doing full briefs for cases was a waste of time. (Via Law Ingenue)
I finally uploaded the rest of the Bemidji trip photos.
I’ve seen this happen way too much: an (over)eager local college student visits the law school and sits in on a 1L class.
Within twenty minutes, without fail, the college student is misery personified.
I’m in Corporations right now with one such undergrad sitting to my right.
Today’s topic is the basics of incorporation. The reading was dense. It consisted of definitions in paragraph form: Public v. Closely held corporations, articles of incorporation, director liability, etc, etc, etc.
So today’s class is straight-lecture. No cases, no jokes…it’s horribly boring if you haven’t read the material and don’t know what’s going on.
And judging by the amount of Gmail chat screens… today’s class isn’t that interesting even if you HAVE read the material.
I’ve seen some college students quit on their sit-ins halfway through. I think today’s victim is going to tough it out though.
This is partially the admissions office’s fault – if you’re going to let a prospective student sit in on a class you can’t arbitrarily shove them in Civil Procedure or Corps. A safer choice is a debate and case heavy course like Criminal Law, Torts, or Constitutional Law. (and even then, this is professor specific)
And undergrads: (all you 0L’s out there) Do not sit in on law school classes before you start law school. Save the confusion and boredom for orientation. There are no magical law school insights that come from sitting in on a single, random 1L class. Torts with Professor A is different than torts with Professor B.
Professor A is a sadist, Professor B is a dull lecturer. Professors C-E are amazing, but you’ll never know, because you sat in on Prof A or B’s class and didn’t apply.
My advice? Read blawgs, attend accepted students weekend (and talk to 1Ls), and if you are interested in your undergrad’s law school then drop by the law school during lunch and talk to some students. If you’re nice and don’t linger, you probably won’t get bit.
Ms. Montana-Cyrus is inspiring litigation:
A dude claims he’s the inspiration and more for “Hannah Montana” and wants Disney to give him due credit — as in a lot of money.
Richard Fronduto filed a lawsuit today in L.A. County Superior Court, claiming he wrote a script in 1990 called “The Secret Life of Sindi” which eventually became “The Family Business.”
Fronduto claims his agent pitched his work to Disney and that Disney liked it so much they asked him to turn his script into a two-hour pilot. In short, he claims he’s the brainchild for what became “Hannah Montana.” (Via TMZ)
Turns out that this isn’t the only Hannah Montana law suit…
Whenever a show or movie experiences high success rates, the inevitable happens. Someone shows up to claim that this lucrative idea was theirs all along. Such is the case with Disney’s Hannah Montana. This weekend, a comedy writer has filed a lawsuit against the Walt Disney Company that, in 2001, he came up with the idea for a show but used a different show title.
Taylor “Buddy” Sheffield, a veteran comedy writer, is suing for alleged breach of contract, breach of confidence, unfair competition and unjust enrichment. Six years ago, he pitched a show called Rock and Roland to the Walt Disney Company, about a middle school girl who has a secret alter-ego as a rock star. Sound familiar? (Via TV Buddy)
I couldn’t find anything on the Sheffield case except for a more recent lawsuit for Disney canning him. Hm.
Now, I know this may be outrageous, but maybe the problem is that the premise of Hannah Montana isn’t that original? Just a thought… I prefer Trace Cyrus anyway…
A University of Minnesota law school classic – Commonwealth v. Pestinikas, a case about a breach of contract that resulted in a murder conviction.
The gist: A couple agreed to care for an elderly man. They took his money, stuck him on an enclosed porch, and let him starve to death.
A various collection of thoughts
As I mentioned in my last post, two of my professors pick around two students for a class period and call on them the entire time. I thought this would be great at first, but it turns out not to be.(Via Non Minority Student)
John Grisham: The Associate
An ATL Exclusive Interview With John Grisham About His Latest Book
John Grisham sat down with us this morning for an exclusive blog interview to discuss his new book, The Associate. The book’s main character, Kyle McAvoy, is a Biglaw associate with a mysterious past and intriguing future.
In his previous books, Grisham has explored emotional and ethical costs of practicing the law in various forms. But his latest book takes dead aim at the life, and lifestyle, of junior associates at top Manhattan law firms. (Via Above the Law)
Outrage halts launch of ‘Caylee Sunshine’ doll
A Florida company is suspending launch of its “Caylee Sunshine” doll following a public outcry that included members of slain toddler Caylee Anthony’s family. (Via CNN)
Several of my housemates have started busing home because of the cold.
I walked home for lunch, but decided to try the bus-thing after school..
After 5 minutes on the bus I had an epiphany: The University of Minnesota has campuses in St. Paul and Minneapolis. The campus connector bus probably connects the campuses…
I looked out the window and realized the bus was on the expressway to St. Paul. Doh.
Next time I take the campus shuttle...
I eventually get back to Minneapolis and buy a McFlurry from McDonald’s. The nice thing about -8 is that McFlurrys don’t melt on the way home…
30 minutes later I’m in the living room watching TV with some housemates. The doorbell rings.
It’s a woman smoking a cigarette, holding a 12-pack of beer and a pitbull-lab mix on a leash.
Woman: “I got in a fight with my boyfriend. I’m going to stay at a hotel tonight or something…Can I wait in your foyer while I wait for the cab? I gave them your address…”
So we had a pitbull running around the living room while three of us were looking up dog-friendly hotels…
***update… my housemate just walked out with a bat in a box… I guess another bat got in the house…
Housemate #1: “Aww! The bat looked so cute! It was so small!”
Housemate #2: “What? No! I was gonna go bat-shit on that bat!”
Housemate #1: “Oh look, my humidifier just came! I’m gonna go humidify myself!
Things are too weird right now. I’m going to bed.
Don’t ask me:
Professor P: “Okay, you suggested a case and shot it down, so let me rephrase my question: Does the Plaintiff win under Ohio v. Shaw?”
Jack: “Uh…” (flips through book) “…obviously I don’t know the answer because I’m looking for it.
It was downhill from there…
Jill: “I think there’s a difference between marking and capturing. Dogs mark things all the time and don’t capture them!”
Professor P: “Uh, let’s assume for a moment that dogs can’t obtain property rights…. so that’s not the best example…”
Lawyer fail (re: this case):
Professor P: “And Ganter presented the maxim: “Finder’s keepers losers weepers.” That was his legal argument!” If you had to guess, would say that he was represented?
Jack: “No, I guess he was representing himself.”
Professor P: “Well, actually he WAS represented by a lawyer!”
It’s poop suit day* in Property class.
Jack speaks plainly:
Jack: “Apparently in 1869 the roads were covered with manure.”
Poop ensnarement?
Professor P: “Do we have something close to possession of the manure? Like ensnarement?”
Professor P: “Did the manure become wild or unowned?”
Haslem v. Lockwood, 37 Conn. 500 (Conn. 1871) — (Or Westlaw: 1871 WL 1608 )
I’m not sure if facebook chat is sucking, or if it’s the school internet…
Because grades come out at 4pm, the law school is forcing us to attend a “please don’t drop out” lecture. This is how it started:
Student council president: “There are some research studies on the effect of grades on depression, and turns out the lower you are on the bell curve, the more depressed you are!”
Dean: “Don’t worry. I’ll be talking after him.”
Starting Statutory Interpretation on a high note:
Professor S: “You all have finished a semester of law school so you should be able to answer this question: Where can we find law? Who makes it, and where is it found?”
Jack: “Cities!”
Professor S: “Uh…cities? I guess you can find a book of statutes in a city…”
It looks like facebook has just become a news service. There’s a public photo album* of a UN school bombed by Israelis.
Here is a video via Al Jazeera.
* Warning there are some pictures of dead school children.
The Gamma house president has been looking for his wallet for four days. He’s ripped both couches in the living room apart, checked with local stores…
Someone saw a wallet in the couch, but we quickly determined that I had left (and found) my wallet in the couch that day.
I was at Jamie’s this weekend. I came back today and started cleaning my room.
As I’m folding laundry I feel something in the back of a pair of shorts. I wore these shorts around the house Thursday night…I shake the shorts…and out falls the president’s wallet.
Oops. I guess I found two wallets that day.
Oh law school discussion… someone posted this:
I’m graduating from UC Berkeley with a 3.85 GPA in May and am strongly considering law school. A friend of mine currently at Boalt Law School recently commented:
“Law school is where happiness goes to die.”
I realize law school is hard, but would you say its generally harder than most other graduate courses of study? In particular, as a somewhat spiritually-attuned person, I aim to preserve some amount of joy in my life amid obligations which might run counter. To this end, I have had some concern whether I’ll be able to maintain my spiritual vitality amid the rigid pedantry of law school.
This aspect of my quality of life is very important to me, and so I’ve wondered what kind of person law school might cause me to become. I’ve said to myself: Whatever happens, I will not allow law school to violate my spirituality; I will keep a distance between the two so that both can co-exist. Do you believe this is possible, or do you think that anyone in law school is condemned to some degree of spiritual alienation?
More generally, I’d be interested in hearing of your law school experience in this context, as well your experience in your present job. Are/were you unhappy? Do/did you feel that you’ve made the wrong decision? What is/was your daily experience like? Do/did you have time for relationships and engagement with things you’re passionate about? Do/did you feel that the study and practice of law may have sapped your capacity for joy?
(cough) let’s leave the writing skills alone for a minute… Someone responded with:
Honestly, I don’t think [you have] the personality to become a lawyer. Or at least not a BigLaw lawyer. Maybe alternative dispute resolution or a yoga career is for you.
Best response ever.
Jamie stole my camera and…