Don’t ask me:
Professor P: “Okay, you suggested a case and shot it down, so let me rephrase my question: Does the Plaintiff win under Ohio v. Shaw?”
Jack: “Uh…” (flips through book) “…obviously I don’t know the answer because I’m looking for it.
It was downhill from there…
Jill: “I think there’s a difference between marking and capturing. Dogs mark things all the time and don’t capture them!”
Professor P: “Uh, let’s assume for a moment that dogs can’t obtain property rights…. so that’s not the best example…”
Lawyer fail (re: this case):
Professor P: “And Ganter presented the maxim: “Finder’s keepers losers weepers.” That was his legal argument!” If you had to guess, would say that he was represented?
Jack: “No, I guess he was representing himself.”
Professor P: “Well, actually he WAS represented by a lawyer!”
Further Reading...
Mrs. Rush falls into the tiolet…
November 17, 2008The end of ConLaw
December 3, 2008How John saved Statutory Interpretation
February 24, 2009
Previous Post
Poop Suit day
Next Post

1 Comment
Best Year Ever: Outline of 1L Spring Semester | Dennis Jansen
March 12, 2015 at 8:47 am[…] Property is full of fail, and hilarity. […]